The Imitation Game

From the moment you were born, the world had opinions about who you should be.

Not out of malice. Out of love, mostly. Parents, teachers, well-meaning adults who wanted the best for you and communicated it the only way they knew. By pointing at someone else.

Be more like your brother. Look how well she's doing. Why can't you be more like him.

And then, as you got older, the pointing got louder and more sophisticated. Celebrities to emulate. Influencers to follow. Role models to aspire toward. An entire culture organised around the idea that somewhere out there is a version of life being lived correctly, and your job is to study it carefully and reproduce it as faithfully as you can.

Nobody called it the imitation game. But that's what it was.

And somewhere along the way, without noticing, you started playing it.

What imitation costs

The problem with imitation isn't that it's lazy or unambitious. It's that it's structurally impossible.

You cannot actually become someone else. You can perform them. You can adopt their habits, their aesthetic, their way of moving through the world. You can get very good at the impression. But underneath the performance, something keeps quietly insisting that this isn't quite right. That something is slightly off. That you haven't quite found the version of yourself that finally fits.

Which is when the Mindline steps in with its helpful explanation.

The reason it doesn't fit, the mind concludes, is that you haven't found the right model yet. Or haven't imitated it well enough. Or haven't put in sufficient work to become the person you're trying to be.

So you look harder. Copy more carefully. Work more diligently on becoming something other than what you already are.

And the feeling of something being slightly off quietly intensifies. Because the further you move from your own natural expression, the stronger the signal gets that you've drifted.

The feeling was never telling you that you hadn't found the right role model.

It was telling you that you'd been playing someone else's role.

The language already knew

Notice what we call the people we're encouraged to imitate.

Role models.

Not life models. Not human models. Role models. People who demonstrate a role worth performing. The language has always known what the exercise actually is. We just stopped noticing.

And when we talk about the people we admire in professional life, we say things like finding our place, playing to our strengths, performing well, being in our element. The entire framework of how we think about work, success and identity is already saturated with the language of performance.

Which is fine, as long as you know you're performing.

The problem is when the performance becomes so complete, so thoroughly inhabited, that the distinction between the performer and the role disappears entirely. When the imitation becomes the identity. When you can no longer remember what was there before you started trying to be something else.

The apple tree

Consider an apple tree.

It isn't trying to be an oak. It isn't studying the oak across the field and working on its bark, its height, its particular quality of shade. It isn't following the oak on whatever passes for social media in the forest and wondering why it can't quite achieve that level of presence.

It's just being an apple tree. Completely. Without apology or ambition or comparison.

And in being completely an apple tree, it's extraordinary. The specific way its branches reach.

The particular quality of its blossom in spring. The apples that no other tree will ever quite produce. Not because it worked hard to differentiate itself. Because it simply is what it is, without interference.

A snowflake doesn't aim to be a particular shape. The shape is just what happens when that specific, unrepeatable combination of temperature, humidity and movement comes together in that precise moment. No two identical. Not one of them trying to be another.

Each one a unique expression of the same process.

That's what you are.

Not a person trying to navigate life correctly. Life expressing itself as a person. Completely, specifically, unrepeatable you. The particular combination of everything you've experienced, everything you've felt, everything you've noticed, coming together in a way that has never happened before and will never happen again.

The intelligence behind all of this doesn't produce copies.

It never has.

Every expression is new. Every person unrepeatable. The universe has been doing this since before time was a concept, and in all of that extraordinary proliferation of life, there has never been another you.

Not almost another you. Not a close approximation. Another you.

What the Mindline says about this

The Mindline has a view, of course.

It says you're not enough as you are. That the natural expression of who you actually are isn't quite sufficient. That somewhere out there is a better version, a more successful version, a more together version, and your job is to close the gap between who you are and who that person is.

It says celebrate your uniqueness once you've fixed the parts that aren't working. Once you've sorted yourself out. Once you've become the version of yourself that finally measures up.

But that's not celebrating uniqueness. That's celebrating the imitation, once it's good enough.

The Mindline was running on a false premise from the beginning. The inadequacy it was pointing at was never real. It was an interpretation. A story formed early, confirmed often, mistaken for the truth.

Your specific expression of life was never the problem.

It was always the point.

What stops the imitation

Not effort. Not a decision to be more authentic or a commitment to finding your true self.

Just seeing the game clearly enough that continuing it loses its grip.

When the imitation is recognised as imitation, something quietly returns. Not a new self, discovered at last after years of searching. Just what was always already there, underneath the performance. The natural expression that was running before the copying started. Quieter than the performance. Less defined. But completely, recognisably yours.

The apple tree doesn't have to work to stop being an oak. It just has to stop pretending it isn't an apple tree.

Which, it turns out, takes considerably less effort than the alternative.

The Recognition

You were never supposed to be anyone else.

Not a better version of yourself modelled on someone you admire. Not the person your parents hoped you'd become or your culture told you to aspire toward. Not the role the world cast you in before you were old enough to audition.

Just this. The specific, unrepeatable, never-been-before expression of the intelligence behind everything. Warts, quirks, particular genius and all.

The imitation game was always running on the premise that what you already are isn't enough. But that premise was never true. It was just the Mindline's version of things.

Two snowflakes aren't the same. An apple tree isn't trying to be an oak. They are simply, completely, perfectly what they are.

And in being completely what they are, extraordinary.

So are you.

You always were.

----------------------------------------

If something in this article resonates with you and you'd like to talk it through, you're welcome to get in touch. A conversation with Marcus won't give you something new to carry. It might just help you put down something you've been carrying for a long time.

Start a Conversation →​