Why Fixing Never Finishes
- Marcus Fellowes

- Feb 10
- 3 min read
Updated: Apr 16
You sort something out.
The difficult conversation gets resolved. The goal gets achieved. The understanding arrives. The tension eases.
And for a while, things feel better.
Then, without anything dramatic happening, the feeling returns. A new problem assembles. The urgency rises again. And the fixing begins again.
Most people assume this means the fix didn't work. That they need a better fix. A deeper fix. A more permanent fix.
But that's not what's happening.
What the fix is actually doing
When the Workshop runs, when you work to resolve the feeling, something real happens.
Effort is made. Progress occurs. Things genuinely improve at the surface level.
But underneath the effort, something else is happening simultaneously.
The act of fixing confirms that something needed fixing.
Every time the Workshop starts, it begins from the same assumption. There is a problem. The problem is real. The problem is about me. And it needs to be resolved before things can be okay.
That assumption is not being examined. It's being acted on.
And acting on an assumption reinforces it. The more consistently the fixing runs, the more solid the assumption becomes. The more solid the assumption becomes, the more readily the next sensation is interpreted as a new problem requiring a new fix.
The fix and the problem are not opposites.
They are the same movement.
The structure of the Workshop
Here is what the Workshop actually is.
A sensation arises. The learned pattern interprets it as a problem. The problem is personal. The solution is projected into the future. The Workshop starts moving toward that solution.
The Workshop can take many forms. Striving. Analysing. Improving. Planning. Seeking understanding. Pursuing therapy. Developing spiritually. Working harder. Becoming better.
All of it is genuine. All of it involves real effort. And all of it begins from the same place.
The assumption that something is wrong and needs resolving.
Which means every session in the Workshop is a fresh confirmation that the assumption is true.
Not because the assumption is true. Because the Workshop treats it as true each time it starts.
Why the feeling returns
The feeling doesn't return because the fix failed.
It returns because the interpretation that produced the feeling is still being applied.
The fix addressed the surface. The practical situation. The external circumstances. But the interpretation, the learned pattern that reads neutral sensations as evidence of deficiency, was never touched.
So the next sensation arrives. The pattern applies the same meaning. A new problem assembles. The urgency rises. The Workshop starts again.
This is not a character flaw. It is not evidence of weakness or insufficient effort.
It is what happens when the fix is aimed at the situation rather than at the interpretation that turned the situation into a problem.
What would actually interrupt it
Not a better fix.
Not a deeper understanding. Not a more sophisticated version of the Workshop.
The only thing that interrupts the loop at its source is seeing the interpretation as an interpretation rather than as a report on reality.
When the sensation arises and the learned pattern steps in, that move, from neutral signal to personal problem, is visible in that moment. Not as a concept. As something actually happening.
When that move is seen clearly, the interpretation loses the authority it had when it was being mistaken for fact.
The urgency reduces. Not because the situation changed. Because what produced the urgency has been seen for what it is.
The Workshop doesn't need to be forced to stop.
It simply has nothing to start from.
The exhaustion makes sense
If you have been fixing for years and the feeling keeps returning, that exhaustion is completely understandable.
Not because you have been doing it wrong.
Because fixing from the assumption of deficiency confirms the assumption each time. The harder the fixing runs, the more solid the assumption becomes. The more solid the assumption becomes, the more the next sensation feels like a problem requiring resolution.
The effort was real. The intention was genuine.
But the direction was aimed at the situation rather than at what was producing the problem from the situation each time.
Seeing that is not a failure.
It is the first moment the loop can actually be interrupted.



Comments